Research Design Review

A Discussion of Qualitative & Quantitative Research Design

Menu

Home
About Research Design Review
About the Author
Qualitative Workshops & Instruction
BOOK: Applied Qualitative Research Design
Roller Website
Twitter
LinkedIn
Contact

Search for:

Applying a Quality Framework to the In-depth Interview Method

Share this:

Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in In-depth Interviewing, In-depth interviews, Qualitative Research, Quality Standards, Research Design & Methods, Total Quality Framework and tagged in-depth interviewing, qualitative methods, qualitative research design, quality framework, Total Quality Framework on August 11, 2016 by Margaret R. Roller. 7 Comments

Post navigation

← Mitigating Researcher-as-instrument Effects

Reporting Qualitative Research: A Model of Transparency →

7 comments

Pingback: Distinguishing Between the Research IDI & Everything Else | Research Design Review
Pingback: Strengths & Limitations of the In-depth Interview Method: An Overview | Research Design Review
Pingback: Qualitative Research: A Collection of Articles from 2016 | Research Design Review
Pingback: Reporting Qualitative Research: A Model of Transparency | Research Design Review
Cheryl Dellasega says:

August 16, 2016 at 13:50

Margaret you are a tremendous resource! Thank you for sharing your wisdom on qualitative methods.

LikeLike

Reply
1. Margaret R. Roller says:
  
  August 16, 2016 at 17:43
  
  Thank you, Cheryl, for your kind words. My hope is to inspire dialog and discussion.
  
  LikeLike
  
  Reply
szergout says:

August 11, 2016 at 14:04

Reblogged this on Managementpublic.

LikeLike

Reply

Leave a Reply to Cheryl Dellasega Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Δ

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recipient of the 2021 AAPOR Book Award

Subscribe to RDR

Email Address:

Recent Posts

The Focus Group Method: Where It Came From & How It Is Used
Ethnography: An Example of Transparent Reporting
Learning to Find Meaning in Qualitative Research: 6 Articles
Qualitative Content Analysis: 6 Articles on the Definition & Quality Design Considerations
A Lesson in Guide Development: Part 2
A Lesson in Guide Development: Part 1
In-depth Interview Method: Strengths & Limitations of 4 Modes
Focusing on a Research Design Reality: Questions Lead to Answers

Archives

Archives

© Margaret R. Roller and Research Design Review, 2009-2023. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Margaret R. Roller and Research Design Review with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Tag Cloud

#mrx bias bulletin boards case study research consumer research content analysis context corporate research Credibility ethical considerations ethnography focus group discussions focus groups guide development in-depth interviewing listening marketing research market research mixed methods research mobile research multiple methods narrative research nonresponse online research projective techniques qualitative analysis qualitative content analysis qualitative methods Qualitative Research qualitative research design qualitative research proposal quality framework quantitative analysis quantitative research design question design reflexive journal reflexivity reporting research analysis research design researcher bias research error satisfaction research saturation social media social media research survey research Total Quality Framework transparency validity

Recipient of the 2021 AAPOR Book Award

© Margaret R. Roller and Research Design Review, 2009-2023. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Margaret R. Roller and Research Design Review with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Blogroll

EPIC
Methodspace
Pew Research
research.
The Psych Files
The Qualitative Report
Why Social Science

Blogroll

EPIC
Methodspace
Pew Research
research.
The Psych Files
The Qualitative Report
Why Social Science

Contact Information

804-514-5898

rmr@rollerresearch.com

Follow Following
- Research Design Review
- Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

%d bloggers like this: